Category Archives: Session

House Session categories.

Unanimous Consent Speech – June 26, 2025

Linked at timestamp

Thank you Mr. Speaker.

I was going to save this for veto day, to be closer to the anniversary, but world events this past week motivated me to rise today.

On October 19, 2005, 6.5miles from the Syrian border along the Euphrates, 3rd Bn 6th Marines, Kilo Company, 1st Platoon, 3rd Squad was on a foot patrol along ASR Diamond in the Al’Qaim Region of the Al’Anbar province in Iraq. Random patrols through the community were meant to keep insurgents at bay, discourage the planting of IEDs and weapons caches, and build rapport with the community so they’d be more inclined to report suspicious activities in the area. On that day, there were warning signs, the children were acting strange, they didn’t follow the patrol asking for MREs or money like most days, the shops were closed. The patrol still went on, and heads were on a swivel. But readiness and vigilance can only do so much. Blind alleys between cinderblock walls are commonplace in Iraq.

I know this, because I was on that patrol. I saw the car leap out from the alley feet from Anderson. I heard the order from Thornton to “shoot that M-Fer”. I saw Anderson fire a precision shot through the windshield into the driver’s head. I witnessed the vehicle vaporize from within into a violent explosion. I don’t remember the sound, though. I remember picking myself up from the dirt after being knocked on my ass, miraculously uninjured. I remember running up the column to a roadside ditch to roll Sanford face-up. I remember he came to, thankfully alive. I remember repeatedly watching nearby rooftops for secondary attackers as was common throughout the war. I remember seeing Thornton realize he had a hole in his leg and he sat back down to tourniquet his own wound, still giving us orders to set up a perimeter. I remember Melo screaming, he was 2nd man in the column, and caught a bunch of shrapnel in his gut. And, hauntingly, I remember Hubbard exclaiming from up the road “Wally’s f-ing wasted, man!” Hubbard also had a wounded leg his adrenaline didn’t allow him to feel. Wally was the nickname of Lance Corporal Norman Anderson III, our point man, killed in action.

Later, it was determined by the EOD team in the Battalion QRF that the SVBIED’s hood release was wired as a deadman switch. Wally’s lightning fast acquisition of the target, and single shot saved the lives of every other member of the squad, myself included. Some of us have scars, both physical and psychological, but we are alive today because of the bravery and skill of that one man.

I’ve dedicated that life to speaking out against warmongering, advocating for tempered approaches, and skepticism towards the claims made by our intelligence agencies and the Pentagon. I ask you to join me in skepticism towards reports of “weapons of mass destruction,” claims that “we will be welcomed as liberators,” “mission accomplished,” assertions that there were long-term plans for Afghanistan and Iraq, or the blatant lies like “we will not put boots on the ground in Syria.” I push for skepticism against the intelligence community because their mistakes (giving extreme benefit of the doubt that they were JUST mistakes), cost the lives of the men and women whose patriotism drove them to join our all-volunteer military. We should not recklessly take advantage of that patriotism, we should not send them into harm’s way unless absolutely necessary to protect the lives of American citizens here at home.

I did not enlist after 9/11 to enact regime change in Iraq and I’d venture a guess it’d be rare to find soldiers, sailors, airmen, or marines that told their recruiters their explicit reason for signing up in the last few years was to march on Tehran. So when people chest-thump on Facebook and Twitter, and have whataboutism arguments about previous presidents’ actions over the last several decades of CONSTANT war through ALL of the administrations, remember the 2002 AUMF for Iraq passed bipartisanly 296 to 133 due to political pressure from the people. Remember how certain the intelligence community was about the manufacture of weapons of mass destruction. Remember the lies about Saddam being in league with bin Laden. Remember how most of the pundits and talking heads that pushed for the Iraq war, cheered it on, have since recanted. Remember that we never even passed an AUMF for Syria despite putting boots on the ground, and Al’Qaida is currently killing Alawites and Christians each day since we assisted them in taking the country from the Assad regime. Remember Iran is bigger than Iraq and Afghanistan combined in both land area and population, with the worst features of both.

I ask that you remember this unanimous consent when I rise before you all again in January. I ask that you remember the sacrifices of the men and women that continue to volunteer to wear the uniform. I ask you to pray, and speak loudly for peace, and to bring our troops home from places they shouldn’t be, and out of harm’s way. And finally, I ask you to remember Lance Corporal Norman “Wally” Anderson III, the man that saved the lives of his squadmates 20 years ago. Thank you.

HB229 Defend the Guard Unceremoniously Dies in NH Senate

The Interim Study motion recommended by Senate Finance passed on a voice vote today. This is unquestionably the last stop for the bill this term, as the Senate is unlikely to form a study committee on the subject and will let it die on the vine.

Primary season approaches, and without a roll call disproving otherwise, it is safe to assume the entire Republican caucus of the Senate opposes Defend the Guard, save for Abbas who testified in person in support. This past weekend, DTG was added to the NHGOP platform with overwhelming support from the several hundred delegates in attendance. The Republicans of this state have spoken, and we want this passed.

There’s opportunity for synergy during door knocking, as well. Former Senate President Chuck Morse is running for governor, and is the only gubernatorial candidate in the country that has openly supported Defend the Guard. If you wish to link up, fill out this form here, and I’ll be happy to join you knocking for Senate primary opponents and for the future governor of New Hampshire!

HB2 (Budget) Passed – State of Emergency Reform Included

I’ll start with a bit of history on State of Emergency (SoE) Reform this session.

HB127 was the bill I was co-sponsored on that included last term’s SoE language. It left Executive Departments committee with an 11-7 vote to pass. From there, a roll call vote of 193-185 passed it out of the House. The Senate then ran defense for the Governor, with their committee recommending to kill the bill, stating “it does nothing” and unceremoniously allowing it to die on the Senate floor by a cowardly voice vote.

There’s some debate on the excuses, some claiming they believed the text didn’t change current law, and then others claiming they knew the text was included in HB2 so they killed the standalone bill since the Governor would veto. This is a running theme with the Senate – instead of forcing the corner office to bear the shame of vetoing bills that would make him look bad, they find excuses to do his bidding and act as his representation in the Legislature, instead of their constituents’.

Meanwhile, the House stuffed the text of HB127 into the budget trailer bill (HB2) as a safeguard, assuming the standalone bill will once again get vetoed. The budget was a battle in an of itself, but ultimately passed out of the house with a voice vote after the Freedom Caucus attempted, but failed, to correct the massive overspending.

When HB2 arrived in the Senate, the language of HB127 was the first to be struck. This, again, was likely due to the request of the Governor. Thankfully Melissa Blasek at RebuildNH spotted this in the hard-to-follow daily reports on the GenCourt website and notified myself and several other Reps. We immediately took to the phones and contacted Senators Gray and Carson, explaining we would not vote for this budget if SoE was not included.

I also took to Twitter.

There was an angry return phone call from Gray where he once again tried to claim the language “does nothing” but as soon as I explained what it changed, he stated the Governor would likely veto the budget if the language was included, meaning Gray knew the language did *something* but assumed I would back off, or was quizzing my knowledge of my own co-sponsorship – not sure which. He said my attitude was brinksmanship, which is true, but some priorities are too important to compromise over.

I also confirmed my position again.

After about a week, the sheer amount of principled liberty Reps must’ve concerned the Senate enough that they had to put SoE Reform back into HB2.

Much to the Governor’s chagrin, I assume.

This brings us to yesterday, June 8th. The Concur motion on the Senate-amended HB2. They did a lot of dancing around with numbers, moving some spending from 2024 into this year by consuming a budget surplus and claiming they cut down the budget by ~$750M by doing so. But the real choice now had to be made: Pass the bloated budget, and take whatever wins from it that we can, or send it to a committee of conference.

If the bill went to committee of conference due to Republicans not getting on board, the Senate would absolutely strip SoE as the first order of business as a “well, we gave you what you wanted, but it wasn’t enough, so now you get nothing” retribution. They’d also add in a bunch of junk to win over the solid voting block of the Dems, meaning the bad budget would only get worse. My choice was to pass the budget and get a few wins in HB2, to include SoE Reform, faster Interest and Dividends tax phase out, minor occupational licensing reform, and an alert system to Federal checkpoints.

The budget ultimately passed with a resounding super majority of 326-52. Coupled with the unanimous 24-0 vote from the Senate, any veto from the Governor will be overturned. I campaigned on SoE reform, and the path was rocky, but we’re going to get there.

FLOOR SPEECHES – March 16 (HCR4 – Article V Convention of States – Term Limits )

I gave the Parliamentary Inquiry today in support of HCR4 – an application to an Article V Convention of States for the purpose of proposing an amendment to the Constitution for U.S. Congressional Term Limits.

I am both a proponent for Article V CoS, as well as a supporter for Term Limits for all Federal positions – elected or otherwise. Cronyism is rampant in DC and it is obvious those that have been down there the longest are the least likely to fix the issues, and ultimately have voted against America’s best interests time and time again.

I could write an entire blog post about why I believe an Article V convention would be a solution to many of our problems with the Federal government, but I’ll save it for another day. Here is my parliamentary inquiry for HCR4:

Mr. Speaker, if I know that Congress has proposed over 12,000 amendments to the Constitution since 1789, and yet the States have proposed 0 despite both having the equal power to do so

And if I know that 82% of voters (87 percent Republican, 83 percent democrat, 78 percent independent) support term limits for Congress, showing rare bipartisan agreement,

And if I know the current system overwhelmingly protects incumbents, with only 20 percent of races being competitive, and fundraising for their next race becomes the primary focus of these incumbents, not serving their constituents,

And finally, if I know Congress has a current approval rating of 28 percent, and this is our chance, and our constitutional responsibility to correct, then I would pass the green button and support the committee recommendation of OTP on HCR4.

FLOOR SPEECHES – February 23 (HR8 + HR9)

Here are links to my floors speeches and parliamentary inquiries on the House YouTube channel, as well as the text of my floor speeches. HR9 ended up not having floor debate, but I had a prepared speech just in case.

The HR9 PI once again had me going viral in the liberty Twitter world, with my thanks to AFP’s Chris Maidment!

HR8 – Federal Assault Weapons Ban Resolution

HR8 was the first bill I argued on the house floor since becoming a New Hampshire State Rep, and it was entirely within my wheelhouse. It was to request the Federal government to enact an “assault weapons” ban.

Thank you Mr. Speaker.

I rise to speak in support of the committee report of ITL on HR8

The 20th Century was filled with millions of reasons to never permit a government to restrict your natural right of self defense.

Pol Pot – 2 Million

Adolf Hitler – 13 million

Joseph Stalin – 20 Million

Mao Zedong – 45 Million.

These are the lowball estimates of civilians massacred after private firearm ownership was banned by those leaders.

Contrary to what Biden may repeat in front of the cameras, our natural right to keep and bear arms is not so we can go deer hunting, or sport shooting. It is to prevent the horrors that have played out by fascist governments.

Supporters of a Federal Assault Weapon’s ban will echo the refrain that the founders could not have imagined modern firearms. But cannons existed, privateers owned battleship equivalents of the day. The founders were fully aware of the evolution of arms, and this is evident by the use of that specific word – “arms” in the 2nd Amendment. Not just muskets, not just swords, not just pistols, no such limitation is defined.

In Congress last session, HR1808 was the proposed Assault Weapons Ban of 2022. The bill swept so broadly it would make millions of owned firearms illegal overnight, also including several hunting rifle and shotgun models. During the hearing Congressman Dan Bishop asked: “Would anyone on the other side dispute that this bil would ban weapons that are in common use in the US Today?” Chairman Jerry Nadler replied “That’s the point of the bill.” This flies directly in the face of DC v. Heller, where the supreme court held that arms in common use were protected under the 2nd Amendment. This alone makes any bans unconstitutional based on precedent.

HR1808 also exempted all departments of the Federal Government from the ban. All departments. Congressman Thomas Massie attempted to amend the bill, clarifying that of course this wouldn’t include the Departments of Education or Agriculture. Since the bill supporters keep referring to AR15s as “weapons of war” and “only useful for mass murder.” Why would a department of teachers or farmers need this? When answering this very question, the bill supporters said “Because they may need to defend themselves.”

Okay… so they aren’t only useful for mass murder or just for war? And apparently the rest of our lives aren’t important enough to let us defend ourselves in the same manner. This type of monopoly of force is precisely the outcome the founders wanted to prevent by including the second amendment. 

Which, I will add, doesn’t grant us any right. We are born with the natural right to self defense,  to protect ourselves, our families, and our property. The 2nd amendment, along with the entire bill of rights, is a list of restrictions on the Federal government to protect our natural rights and liberty.

Support liberty against tyranny, vote ITL on House Resolution 8.

Parliamentary Inquiry

Thank you, Mr. speaker.

Mr speaker, if I know that the CDC reported a renewed assault weapons ban would have no measurable difference on gun violence.

And if I know that any bill banning firearms in common usage violates the Heller v. DC ruling,

And if I know that Columbine occurred during the last Federal assault weapons ban,

And if I further know we have to only look to the last century to see the disastrous outcome of governments having monopoly ownership over firearms,

And, Mr Speaker, if I know the definition of “shall not be infringed” I would press the green button and ITL HR8.

HR9 – Federal American Marshall Plan Resolution

Thank you Mr. Speaker.

I am here to support the committee report of ITL on HR9.

$31.5T. That’s the current US debt. That is about $250k per taxpayer. That is a debt to GDP ratio of 120%. 

In 2020, the US government injected (printed) approximately $4T dollars in the name of COVID relief. In 2022, another $4T was printed under the ironic name “Inflation Reduction Act.” Coupled with the latter was a provision to hire 87,000 IRS agents. You don’t hire that many agents to just go after a handful of billionaires to make them pay “their fair share.” These agents would go after your tips, and your $600 Venmos. 

Both of these trillions of dollars spending sprees have caused record inflation, and global hesitancy with respect to the dollar. The Saudi’s are shopping around for alternate currencies to trade for their oil, which likely means they’ll be getting a healthy dose of regime change and a hefty plate of freedom soon.

The effects this mass creation of money had on prices is still rippling through the market today, so much so the current administration circled their media empire to try and gaslighting us into thinking inflation is a good thing because it means wages might go up. Might. Meanwhile your savings are depreciating. 

A one-for-one America-centric Marshall Plan would, in today’s dollars, cost at least $173 billion. And with the mismanagement and earmarking of the previous $8T, there’s no way the price tag wouldn’t be identical in scale. And it’d almost certainly contribute half its cost to be lit on fire in Ukraine. Well, not literally, because burning the dollars would at least remove them from circulation and help us in some way.

During testimony it was also made adamantly clear that any projects divvied out under this plan would have prioritized, if not grant exclusively, contracts to union workshops, discriminating against the massive amount of independent workers in the country. This type of cash-dump would also feed up through union dues and be paid directly into ActBlue accounts to fund the next generation of lawmakers to craft union-preferential labor bills and so on and so on. But I digress.

We cannot afford a project of this scale. Not only that, but we cannot trust the Federal government to helm such an endeavor. They have proven to be reckless with the checkbook. Until a Convention of States ratifies a balanced budget amendment to the US Constitution, every effort should be made to dissuade further big project spending from the Federal government.

And with that I ask you to vote yes on the ITL motion on HR9.

Parliamentary Inquiry

Mr speaker, if I know the Federal government has spent more money in the last 3 years than ever before, with large portions of that money being misappropriated or going unaccounted for,

And if I know that a project of this size would undoubtedly inject trillions more into the $32.5T national debt, a debt to GDP ratio of 120 percent,

And if I know the inflation reduction act added positions for 87000 IRS agents to squeeze taxes from us to compensate unstoppable Federal spending,

And if I further know that we are still experiencing rapid inflation due to these federal spending sprees, and that inflation is one of the most insidious taxes,

And, finally Mr. Speaker, if I know that Taxation is Theft, then I would press the green button to ITL HR9.

Organization Day

The Strong Squad was sworn in alongside the other New Hampshire State Representative-Elects in a ceremony at the State House in Concord. We are officially Representatives of Pelham.

We all voted for Speaker Packard, House Clerk Smith, and the Sergeant of the Guard. In the joint session with the Senate, we elected Secretary of State Scanlan and State Treasurer Mezzapelle.

The looming issue, after these office elections, was to determine the fate of the tie vote in the Rochester Representative race. Minority leader Representative Wilhelm put forth a motion to vote on House Resolution 6, which would require a run-off election, through the holidays, citing precedent. A motion to table was attempted by Representative Ross Berry, but ultimately failed in a roll call vote. The Strong Squad voted alongside most of the Republican party to table. The original motion then ultimately passed by voice vote, leaving the Rochester seat empty until the town holds their run-off election.

A long first day , but we’re excited for the future. Between the three of us, there are over a dozen legislative service requests (LSRs) filed that we are prime or co-sponsoring for the upcoming legislative session.

To the citizens of Pelham: thank you for your trust in us, and your votes. The fight has just started, and we won’t let you down.